Operating Level Agreement Traduction


FP7 IRMOS also examined aspects of translation of ALS terms at the application level into resource-based attributes to bridge the gap between customer expectations and cloud provider resource management mechanisms. [14] [15] The European Commission has presented a summary of the results of various ALS research projects (from specifications to monitoring, management and implementation). [16] ALS often encompasses many elements, from the definition of services to the termination of the contract. [2] In order to ensure rigorous compliance with ALS, these agreements are often designed with specific lines of demarcation and the parties concerned must meet regularly to create an open communication forum. Rewards and penalties that apply to the supplier are often set. Most ALS also leave room for regular (annual) revisions to make changes. [3] As applications are moved from dedicated hardware to the cloud, they must reach the same level of service, or even more sophisticated than conventional installations. SLAs for cloud services focus on data center features and more recently include network features (see Carrier`s Cloud) to support end-to-end SLAs. [11] A Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) is a standard for monitoring compliance with web services under service level agreements. It allows authors to indicate performance metrics assigned to a web application, desired performance goals, and actions to perform if performance is not achieved.

Cloud computing is a fundamental advantage: shared resources, supported by the underlying nature of a common infrastructure environment. SLAs therefore extend to the cloud and are offered by service providers as a service-based contract and not as a customer-based agreement. Measuring, monitoring and covering cloud performance is based on the final UX or its ability to consume resources. The disadvantage of cloud computing compared to ALS is the difficulty of determining the cause of service outages due to the complex nature of the environment. Service level agreements can contain many service performance metrics with corresponding service level targets. A common case in IT services management is a call center or service desk. Among the metrics generally accepted in these cases is: the main point is the construction of a new level for the network, the cloud or the SOA middleware, capable of creating a negotiating mechanism between service providers and consumers. For example, the EU-funded Framework SLA@SOI 7 research project[12]explores aspects of multi-level, multi-supplier slas within service-based infrastructure and cloud computing, while another EU-funded project, VISION Cloud[13], has delivered results in terms of content-based ALS. The service received by the customer as a result of the service provided is at the heart of the service level agreement. A service level contract is an agreement between two or more parties, one being the customer and other service providers.

It may be a formal or informal legally binding “treaty” (for example. B internal relations within the department). The agreement may include separate organizations or different teams within an organization. Contracts between the service provider and other third parties are often referred to as SLAs (wrongly) – the level of service having been set by the (main) customer, there can be no “agreement” between third parties; these agreements are simply “contracts.” However, operational agreements or olea agreements can be used by internal groups to support ALS. If an aspect of a service has not been agreed with the customer, it is not an “ALS.” Service level agreements are also defined at different levels: a service level contract (SLA) is an obligation between a service provider and a customer. Specific aspects of the service – quality, availability, responsibilities – are agreed between the service provider and the service user. [1] The most common component of ALS is that services are provided to the customer

Pin It